MedTech follows Pharma: The rapid growth of outsourcing in medical device manufacturing

by Carl Hardie and David W. Johnson

<p>MedTech follows Pharma: The rapid growth of outsourcing in medical device manufacturing</p>

This is a companion article to an episode of “House Calls,” a podcast from Cain Brothers, a division of KeyBanc Capital Markets, Inc. Listen to the episode on Key.comApple PodcastsSpotify, or your favorite podcast app.

When Henry Ford developed the modern assembly line in 1913, he sought to control all aspects of production to ensure quality and reduce costs. In 1928, he even built a city in Brazil, dubbed Fordlandia, to grow rubber trees so he could manufacture his own tires. The development of synthetic rubber made Fordlandia a monument to manufacturing hubris, and the city was abandoned without producing a single tire.

Today, the automotive industry bears little resemblance to Henry Ford’s tightly imagined supply chain. In response to technological complexity and relentless margin pressures, auto manufacturers now work collaboratively with outsourcers all over the world. The big auto makers benefit from streamlined production, reduced supply chain and labor costs, and constant innovations in processes and materials. They’re also able to devote more attention to their most value-adding functions such as design and marketing.

As manufacturing and markets become more complex, costly, and competitive, manufacturers inevitably shift an increasing portion of their processes and parts to specialized vendors and suppliers. Compared to most industries, healthcare has been late to the outsourcing game because of sacred priorities around quality, safety, and compliance. But today, the outsourcing wave that transformed the pharmaceutical manufacturing sector over the past few decades — creating whole new categories of companies in the process — shows every sign of transforming MedTech, too.

MedTech isn’t as advanced as Pharma in outsourcing. In part, this is because the product technologies are more diverse, proprietary know-how is spread across a fragmented supply chain, and the more complex products can be difficult to manufacture, requiring more specialized suppliers and service providers.

Accordingly, those outsourcing companies have been slower to expand and consolidate, and the ecosystem is not well understood by stakeholders and investors. Sponsors tend to categorize medical device manufacturing through a product lens, rather than a value chain perspective. And potential acquirers often underprice their bids, not recognizing the real value of these niche companies.

This article describes the MedTech value chain, its historical evolution, and trends that continue to shape and drive its growth. Given the size of that market, the potential profitability of innovative new devices and technologies, and pressures surrounding efficiency, speed to market, cost reduction, and regulatory risk, MedTech outsourcing presents a tremendous growth opportunity for investors, acquirers and consolidators.
 

Where Pharma has gone …

The pharmaceutical sector had a long tradition of doing everything in-house, from drug discovery to clinical trials to manufacturing and marketing. The rise of generic drugs increased pressure on profitability. The industry responded by shifting focus to developing and marketing new patent-protected blockbuster drugs.

This required a level of cost-cutting, operational flexibility, and innovation that could not be supported in-house. So, drug manufacturers examined their entire product lifecycle, from discovery through commercialization, and outsourced whatever they could. In distinct waves, manufacturers turned to three classes of product developers:

  1. Preclinical contract research organizations (CROs) for clinical trials and FDA approvals
  2. Contract manufacturing organizations (CMOs) for actual drug manufacturing
  3. Contract development and manufacturing organizations (CDMOs), which aggregated those processes through acquisition and consolidation to become full-service providers

CDMOs are the logical outsourcing endgame. Their emergence reduces the complexity of managing multiple vendors across the product lifecycle, and has created greater opportunities for efficiency, scale, risk reduction, compliance expertise, and market intelligence. Not surprisingly, CDMOs now account for about a third of total pharma manufacturing.

Pharmaceutical companies function predominantly as discovery, R&D, and product marketing organizations. But without question, pharmaceutical outsourcing works. We’ve all benefited from accelerated innovation in drug discovery and access.

It’s now MedTech’s turn.
 

… MedTech is sure to follow

The medical device manufacturing sector develops a range of products, from the most basic (latex gloves) to an array of sophisticated, costly, and futuristic devices and technologies such as surgical robots, smart monitors, implantable microsensors, and so on. Like drug manufacturers, MedTech original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) rely on an existing product pipeline while constantly striving to bring new products to market.

Starting with well-recognized giants like Medtronic, Stryker, and Boston Scientific, there are over 6,500 OEMs in the U.S. alone, with over 4,000 different types of devices in the market.1 Worldwide, there are over 2 million distinct medical devices in use.2 Historically, the FDA approves about 35 new devices annually. Since 2020, the number of approvals has risen over 20% annually.3 In 2022, the global device market was $562.6 billion and is expected to grow at a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 6.2% to reach about $965.2 billion by 2031.4

That pace is partly fueled by growing demand — from the elderly, the chronically ill, and in emerging markets like India. But it’s also been enabled by advances in technology — ranging from 3D printing, injection molding, and sterilization to the incorporation of digital technology and remote monitoring, the rise of minimally invasive surgical (MIS) procedures, and robot-assisted surgical (RAS) operations.

Starting in the 1990s, MedTech OEMs began outsourcing electronic components and equipment to Asia and elsewhere, following the larger consumer electronic manufacturing trend. In the early 2000s, cardiology devices became more complex, with multiple technologies and specialized materials requiring advanced components that couldn’t be sourced in-house. So, those manufacturers began looking at component and subassembly outsourcing, too. Other interventional product manufacturers followed suit as their devices integrated novel materials, drugs, tissue, software, and electronics capabilities, making it difficult to maintain deep technical expertise in-house across a broad array of core technologies.

Chip Hance, the CEO of Regatta Medical, a private equity-owned partnership, witnessed that shift firsthand. “Clinical research, technology integration, and development took up an increasingly large part of the budget,” Hance recalls. “Staying on top of dozens of technology advances in diverse sectors without specialized partners became both unrealistic and unaffordable. The ROI wasn’t there.”

Steadily over the past few decades, the medical device sector has made greater use of supply chain partners that do component, subassembly, and even final assembly manufacturing to optimize specific segments on the value chain. This was in response to:

  • The inability to master a wide range of cutting-edge technologies in-house that were increasingly incorporated into product development
  • Rising investment costs for new-product development
  • Rising regulatory risk for U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) (European Union) approval (which are different than for pharma)
  • Increasing capital expenditures involved in scaling up commercial volumes
     

Today, it takes on average $30 million to develop a Class II 510(k)-cleared device.5 Those costs make it hard for customers, like hospitals, to afford new devices. But outsourcing has lowered production costs by an average of 15%. It also fills gaps in know-how and specialized capabilities that OEMs lack in-house. And it reduces compliance risk at a time of increased scrutiny in the U.S. and Europe (where more than 500,000 devices will need to be recertified by 2028), even as OEMs face growing challenges in penetrating global markets.

In the U.S., the outsourcing market size was around $7.3 billion in 2020, and is projected to reach $15.1 billion by 2030, with a compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of 9.6%.6 Globally, the medical device outsourcing market was valued at $117.5 billion in 2022 and is expected to grow by 12.1% per year through 2030.6

The outsourcing value chain

The large number and broad range of companies across the value chain make MedTech outsourcing particularly challenging to understand. Many of those subsectors are nascent, highly fragmented, and rapidly expanding.

The value chain can be grouped into three segments: MedTech CROs; medical manufacturing services; and post-manufacturing services.

The Medical Manufacturing and Services Value Chain

It’s subtitled: The outsourced medical manufacturing and service market continues to grow across three key sub-sectors.

The graphic shows three square rooms in sequence, each tilted on their sides and numbered 1,2,3.

The first room shows a clinician standing next to equipment and looking at a medical image.

It’s entitled: Medical Device CRO’s, and includes 8 bullet points as follows:

Design and engineering

Regulatory affairs consulting

Clinical and pre-clinical trials

Data analysis

Human factors testing

Market access

Device commercialization

The second room shows a factory floor supervisor standing before a robotic assembly line.


It’s entitled: Medical manufacturing CMOs, and includes 5 bullets as follows:

CNC machining, wire EDM, EDM, turning or grinding

Mold tooling, injection molding, over-molding, micro-molding or extrusions

Lab-on-a-chip or microfluidic instruments

Integrated electronics and plastics components for advanced sensors

Complex manufacturing for specialty lighting, mobile workstations, or custom equipment for hospitals and surgical centers

The third room shows people working in a lab.

It’s entitled Packaging and Post Manufacturing Services and includes 7 bullets as follows:

Inspection

Kitting or assembly

Packaging validation

Sterilization

Medical coatings

Specialty distribution

MedTech CROs

The MedTech CRO sector includes Design and Engineering. The sector is highly fragmented and contains large firms as well as hundreds of small design shops. CROs support commercialization from concept to market. They conduct and analyze pre-clinical trials, help with regulatory affairs and compliance, facilitate market access, and even provide support with coding and reimbursement.

The pace of consolidation is increasing, with over 55 deals since 20157. OEMs prefer collaborating with fewer vendors with confirmed quality and expertise. In response, CROs are growing their platforms to provide a “one-stop-shop” for OEMs.

Leading companies include:

  • St. Louis Park, Minnesota-based NAMSA, founded in 1967, which offers medical device testing, regulatory, reimbursement and quality consulting, and clinical research services.
  • Monroeville, Pennsylvania-based RQM+ was formed through the merger of R&Q and Maetrics in 2020. Today, it is one of the world’s largest full-service regulatory and quality consulting firms for medical devices and diagnostics.
     

Medical manufacturing

Getting a product through approvals can take anywhere from one to seven years. Then, it’s time for medical manufacturers to step in. Manufacturers work in metals, plastics, or some combination of materials, managing highly complex processes. During the COVID-19 pandemic, many companies in this subsector benefited from the increased need for point-of-care diagnostics, lab-on-a-chip, interventional medicine, robotic assisted surgical procedures, and minimally invasive surgery.

Today, medical manufacturing is the largest and most developed part of the value chain and receives significant interest from investors. As a result, it has also experienced substantial growth and M&A activity over the past 10 years.

Leading companies include:

  • Brooklyn Park, Minnesota-based Cirtec Medical was founded in 1987 to provide end-to-end design and manufacturing services for Class II and III medical devices, especially with neuromodulation devices and implantable drug delivery devices.
  • Nashua, New Hampshire-based Resonetics, also founded in 1987, started as a laser systems integrator then expanded across medical device manufacturing through organic growth and acquisition. Each of its 14 facilities worldwide focuses on specific manufacturing capabilities and technologies, including in advanced engineering, prototyping, product development, and micromanufacturing.
     

Post-manufacturing services

Post-manufacturing service providers specialize in product inspection, cleaning, assembly or kitting, packaging, and sterilization. These services reduce risks and potential conflicts of interest for OEMs.

Additionally, the FDA requires at least one type of medical coating on most implants or devices used in surgical procedures. Medical coating companies provide a range of services, including rough plasma coatings for orthopedic implants that promote bone in-growth; protective coatings for electronics or power tools; anti-microbial and anti-thrombotic coatings; and lubricants for catheters.

Leading companies include:

  • Brea, California-based Life Science Outsourcing was established in 1997 to provide assembly, packaging, sterilization, and specialized capabilities in diagnostics packaging and design, along with regulatory expertise.
  • Fall River, Massachusetts-based Millstone Medical Outsourcing founded in 2000. See below.
     

The growth of a MedTech outsourcer

Millstone Medical Outsourcing was founded in 2000 in Fall River, Massachusetts, to provide one specific service offering to OEMs: non-sterile packaging of spinal implants. Millstone’s founder, Shannon Tillman, was an employee of an OEM and managed an internal team that struggled to meet that need. Knowing an outside vendor could do the job better, he volunteered to set up such a company, and Millstone Medical Outsourcing was born.

The company’s journey illustrates the rapid evolution of the MedTech sector, and the enterprising approach to market opportunity. Over the past two decades, Millstone has added services largely based on customer demand, such as clean room packaging and inventory management. It established a distribution center in Memphis, Tennessee, to be close to the FedEx shipping hub, and it recently acquired two testing companies to augment its inspection services.

General Manager Tom Williams calls it, “growth through osmosis.” He adds, “For an OEM, a lot of this work is very challenging and complex if it’s not their core competency.”

Today, Millstone works with large OEMs, mainly with orthopedic-like devices. It does not manufacture anything, but provides a range of after-market post-manufacturing services, particularly packaging, testing/inspection, and logistics. Sometimes it will manage every aspect of the OEM’s entire supply chain, including sourcing the components. In 2022, it was acquired by private equity firm Arlington Capital Partners.

As companies like Millstone continue to expand, they bring organization, efficiency, and a broader range of services and expertise to MedTech OEMs.
 

Conclusion: The new MedTech manufacturing ecosystem

In recent years, the sector has seen a new wave of innovation and growth as MedTech companies use innovative materials, serve expanded purposes, and integrate digital technology into their offerings.

Millstone Medical’s Tom Williams is enthusiastic about the opportunities: “Large OEMs tend to be comfortable keeping legacy production in-house. But they’re not investing in new facilities and new labor forces anymore. With new devices, they tend to plan from the outset to work with the best contract manufacturers, packaging companies, and so on, because of cost pressures from health systems and GPOs and competitive market dynamics.”

In contrast, Williams says, founder-led OEMs are largely maintaining in-house control over their manufacturing and supply chains. Regatta Medical CEO Chip Hance agrees: “I think OEMs will keep a fair amount of their processes in-house. In moderate growth spaces, iterations are fairly infrequent and there’s not a lot of pressure to outsource, so I don’t see anything like 80% ever happening. But in fast-moving spaces, R&D is constantly iterating, and the critical factor and most expensive component is timeline. That’s where I think you’re going to see a high level of outsourcing that possibly even accelerates the startups in those spaces.”

Since 2010, more than 75 new medical device development companies have been launched, and hundreds of small companies operating in different subverticals work on difference aspects of the same device.

While this depth of expertise is valuable, it can also compound the complexity of coordination and knowledge transfer surrounding device design, clinical or regulatory history, inspections, and so on. For these reasons, outsourcing companies are beginning to consolidate along the value chain, just as pharma outsourcing companies have done.

OEM demand for a sophisticated MedTech outsourcing ecosystem will grow. OEMs want fully integrated one-stop shops capable of accelerating new product launches safely and efficiently, so growth and consolidation will continue inside and across outsourcing subsectors.

Outsourcing is more complex in the MedTech sector, but if this wave continues, MedTech outsourcing will approach levels similar to Pharma in less than a decade.
 

To learn more, contact

Carl Hardie at 312-730-2790 or chardie@cainbrothers.com

David W. Johnson at 312-560-0870 or david.johnson@4sighthealth.com

The information contained in this report was obtained from various sources, including third parties, that we believe to be reliable, but neither we nor such third parties guarantee its accuracy or completeness. Additional information is available upon request. The information and opinions contained in this report speak only as of the date of this report and are subject to change without notice.

This report has been prepared and circulated for general information only and presents the authors’ views of general market and economic conditions and specific industries and/or sectors. This report is not intended to and does not provide a recommendation with respect to any security. Cain Brothers, a division of KeyBanc Capital Markets (“Cain Brothers”), as well as any third-party information providers, expressly disclaim any and all liability in connection with any use of this report or the information contained therein. Any discussion of particular topics is not meant to be comprehensive and may be subject to change. This report does not take into account the financial position or particular needs or investment objectives of any individual or entity. The investment strategies, if any, discussed in this report may not be suitable for all investors. This report does not constitute an offer, or a solicitation of an offer to buy or sell any securities or other financial instruments, including any securities mentioned in this report. Nothing in this report constitutes or should be construed to be accounting, tax, investment or legal advice. Neither this report, nor any portions thereof, may be reproduced or redistributed by any person for any purpose without the written consent of Cain Brothers and, if applicable, the written consent of any third-party information provider.

“Cain Brothers, a division of KeyBanc Capital Markets” is a trade name of KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc. Member FINRA/SIPC.

KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc. and KeyBank National Association are separate but affiliated companies. Securities products and services are offered by KeyBanc Capital Markets Inc. and its licensed securities representatives. Banking products and services are offered by KeyBank National Association. Credit products are subject to credit approval.

Connect With Us

Find an Expert